Thunderf00t theorizes, based on a paper for physicsworld.com by Jim Khalili, that we'd all be better off if there were fewer muslims.
After all, if on one hand they're not producing anything helpful, and at the same time blowing up random bits of civilization, there's not really any trade-off to justify having them around.
Hallmark probably has similar statistics supporting this theory. I'm sure we'll start seeing more scientific papers produced by muslim scholars in the future, right around the same time we start seeing a line of muslim valentine cards.
This also replaces the old argument,
'In the course of the expansion (read: conquest) of the Islamic world, Muslim scholars encountered (read:stole)the science, mathematics, and medicine of antiquity through the works of Aristotle, Archimedes, Galen, Ptolemy, Euclid, and others'
with the question, What have you done for us lately?
Perhaps it is because muslims are such good 'followers' who 'submit'
is what makes them such poor 'leaders' and 'thinkers'.